Friday, November 13, 2009

Think Mink, Or Don't?


True confession: I've got four furs in my closet.

A full length mink, bought off a friend (who was downsizing her mink collection).

An old-school charity shop astrakhan (also known as curly lamb or karakul).

A princess-line glossy fur, sheared, possibly beaver or (gulp) seal, which I found amid a heap of garments on a wrought iron fence: "give me a tenner, love." (That's about $17).

And my favorite, this blond mink capelet owned by one Madame M. R., which I reckon was made in the early 60s, though I highly doubt manufacturer Rossellí actually had branches in Paris and Milan (just as Victoria's Secret has never had a single outlet in London.)


Anyway, I love all these furs, but only ever wear the second and third one, at best once or twice a year.

Why?

1) It never gets bone-chilling dry-cold in London like it does in Chicago or Moscow, so fur's undeniable insulation isn't as necessary here.
2) Anti-cruelty advocates are active and vocal in this town. Since I ride public transport rather than a blackout window sedan, I'd be a walking billboard for the anti-anti cruelty brigade.
3) I much prefer to flaunt under the radar than in somebody's face.

Last weekend's Sunday Times Style magazine had a trend piece claiming that vintage fur was in some way more acceptable, less vulgar, than new.

True, it is reclaiming a garment that might otherwise go into a landfill, but less vulgar? Not so sure. And of course there is the ongoing debate of whether real fur or synthetic is more environmentally friendly--though authentic vintage fur seems to come up tops in the argument.

I wonder how many others are out there in a similar circumstance: buying vintage fur because it's affordable, and gorgeous, then making a relic of it rather than have it--or ourselves, by association--misinterpreted.

I'd love to hear your thoughts.

4 comments:

  1. I think that vintage furs are wonderful...and I own them although it rarely gets cold enough to wear one in Los Angeles.
    I also have no problem with new furs...after all, the animals are farmed and I wear leather shoes, carry a leather bag, and eat meat. I just wish that I could afford a sheared mink coat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I justify vintage fur because the animals theat it came from would have met their natural death by now anyways. Does that make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Belle and Milarca. Was at a lunch today where one of the participants thought it was incredibly strange to eat (at a different lunch) in a room filled with dead animal's (mounted) heads. This wouldn't bother me at all. And I'll wear leather forever. Silk, no prob. Feathers, sure.

    But fur leaves me conflicted. And I have to say I envy both of you, because it is so very lovely to have on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The thought of buying a new fur coat disturbs me - however, buying vintage for me, is honoring both the animal and the era of design the coat was born in. I'd rather honor the animal than see a decent fur landfilled.
    I currently own three Mouton and one Raccoon. All vintage. I LOVE them. The Mouton's (sheepskin)are swing coats (timeless)from the late 50's and the Raccoon is a stroller coat from the 80's.
    I grew up on a working sheep farm, so maybe that makes it easier for me?

    ReplyDelete